Self-Supervised Learning for Reliable Photoplethysmographic Signal Reconstruction Under Dynamic Motion
Keywords:
photoplethysmography; self-supervised learning; motion artifact; wearable health; signal reconstruction; responsible artificial intelligence; health systemsAbstract
Photoplethysmography has become central to wearable health monitoring, but its clinical utility is constrained by motion-induced signal corruption. Recent developments in self-supervised learning offer a promising route for reconstructing photoplethysmographic waveforms without relying on large amounts of labeled clinical data. This paper presents a systems-level analysis of self-supervised signal reconstruction under dynamic motion. It examines the architectural trade-offs between reconstruction fidelity, computational burden, and deployability across edge and cloud resources. Rather than focusing narrowly on algorithmic performance, the discussion integrates data infrastructure, lifecycle governance, robustness, fairness, and regulatory policy. The analysis highlights how self-supervised pre-training can exploit large unlabeled corpora of ambulatory physiological recordings, while downstream adaptation must still satisfy clinical validation demands. It further addresses concerns related to population heterogeneity, skin tone, sensor placement, motion intensity, and longitudinal drift. We argue that reliable photoplethysmographic reconstruction is not solely a signal processing problem but a socio-technical systems challenge requiring coordinated advances in representation learning, data curation, model auditing, and deployment practice. The paper concludes with forward-looking perspectives on sustainable and equitable integration of self-supervised reconstruction into wearable health infrastructures.
References
1. Allen, J. (2007). Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiological Measurement, 28(3), R1–R39. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/28/3/R01
2. Zhang, Z., Pi, Z., & Liu, B. (2015). TROIKA: A general framework for heart rate monitoring using wrist-type photoplethysmographic signals during intensive physical exercise. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 62(2), 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2014.2359372
3. Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., & Hinton, G. (2020). A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, 1597–1607.
4. He, K., Chen, X., Xie, S., Li, Y., Dollár, P., & Girshick, R. (2022). Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 16000–16009.
5. Jaiswal, A., Babu, A. R., Zadeh, M. Z., Banerjee, D., & Makedon, F. (2021). A survey on contrastive self-supervised learning. Technologies, 9(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies9010002
6. Banville, H., Chehab, O., Hyvärinen, A., Engemann, D.-A., & Gramfort, A. (2021). Uncovering the structure of clinical EEG signals with self-supervised learning. Journal of Neural Engineering, 18(4), 046020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/abca18
7. Kiyasseh, D., Zhu, T., & Clifton, D. A. (2021). CLOCS: Contrastive learning of cardiac signals across space, time, and patients. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, 5606–5615.
8. Mehari, T., & Strodthoff, N. (2022). Self-supervised representation learning from 12-lead ECG data. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 141, 105114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105114
9. Wijshoff, R. W. C. G. R., Mischi, M., & Aarts, R. M. (2012). Reducing motion artifacts in photoplethysmograms by using relative sensor motion: phantom study. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 17(11), 117007. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.11.117007
10. Charlton, P. H., Kyriacou, P. A., Mant, J., & Marozas, V. (2022). Wearable photoplethysmography for cardiovascular monitoring. Proceedings of the IEEE, 110(3), 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2022.3149785
11. Zheng, X., Dwyer, V. M., Barrett, L. A., Derakhshani, M., & Hu, S. (2022). Adaptive notch-filtration to effectively recover photoplethysmographic signals during physical activity. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 72, 103303.
12. Liu, X., Zhang, F., Hou, Z., Mian, L., Wang, Z., Zhang, J., & Tang, J. (2021). Self-supervised learning: Generative or contrastive. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(1), 857–876. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3090866
13. Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletari, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M. N., Landman, B. A., Maier-Hein, K., Ourselin, S., Sheller, M., Summers, R. M., Trask, A., Xu, D., Baust, M., & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. npj Digital Medicine, 3, 119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1
14. Ganin, Y., & Lempitsky, V. (2015). Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, 1180–1189.
15. Chen, I. Y., Szolovits, P., & Ghassemi, M. (2021). Can AI help reduce disparities in general medical and mental health care? AMA Journal of Ethics, 23(2), E167–E179. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2021.167
16. Colvonen, P. J., DeYoung, P. N., Bosompra, N. O. A., & Owens, R. L. (2020). Limiting racial disparities and bias in wearable devices. Sleep, 43(9), zsaa159. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaa159
17. Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019). Model cards for model reporting. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287596
18. Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x
19. Zhou, Z., Chen, X., Li, E., Zeng, L., Luo, K., & Zhang, J. (2019). Edge intelligence: Paving the last mile of artificial intelligence with edge computing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(8), 1738–1762. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2019.2918951
20. Pereira, T., Tran, N., Gadhoumi, K., Pelter, M. M., Do, D. H., Lee, R. J., Colorado, R., Meisel, K., & Hu, X. (2020). Photoplethysmography based atrial fibrillation detection: a review. npj Digital Medicine, 3, 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0207-9
21. Moor, M., Banerjee, O., Abad, Z. S. H., Krumholz, H. M., Leskovec, J., Topol, E. J., & Rajpurkar, P. (2023). Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence. Nature, 616(7956), 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05881-4
22. Voigt, P., & Von dem Bussche, A. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A practical guide. Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Clinical and Translational Medicine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



