Personalized Machine Learning for Sleep and Recovery Assessment Using Continuous Photoplethysmographic Monitoring

Authors

  • Keren Chapra Department of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
  • Vishal Lyons Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Rainer C. Murray School of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.

Keywords:

personalized machine learning; sleep assessment; recovery; photoplethysmography; wearable systems; federated learning; health governance; signal quality

Abstract

The increasing availability of wearable photoplethysmographic sensors has created new opportunities for longitudinal sleep and recovery assessment outside clinical sleep laboratories. However, translating raw optical pulse signals into reliable, individualized estimates of sleep architecture and recovery status remains a systems-level challenge. This paper examines personalized machine learning approaches for sleep and recovery assessment using continuous photoplethysmographic monitoring. Rather than focusing narrowly on model accuracy, the discussion integrates sensor data acquisition, signal quality management, personalization architectures, computational infrastructure, governance, fairness, robustness, and sustainability. The analysis emphasizes that photoplethysmography-derived sleep assessment is not simply a signal processing problem but an infrastructure and policy problem involving heterogeneous devices, noisy ambulatory environments, individual physiological variability, and evolving regulatory expectations. Personalized models must adapt to inter-individual differences in cardiovascular dynamics, sleep physiology, and activity patterns while preserving privacy and maintaining clinical credibility. The paper reviews structural trade-offs between centralized, edge-based, and federated learning architectures, considers the role of domain adaptation and incremental personalization, and evaluates the implications of data drift, algorithmic bias, and long-term system maintenance. A central argument is that sustainable deployment requires balancing model expressiveness with interpretability, local responsiveness with global knowledge transfer, and innovation with transparent governance. The conclusion outlines future directions for resilient, fair, and clinically meaningful personalized sleep and recovery systems based on continuous photoplethysmography.

References

1. Barnes, C. M., & Drake, C. L. (2015). Prioritizing sleep health: Public health policy recommendations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 733–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615598509

2. Allen, J. (2007). Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiological Measurement, 28(3), R1–R39. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/28/3/R01

3. Charlton, P. H., Kyriacou, P. A., Mant, J., Marozas, V., Chowienczyk, P., & Alastruey, J. (2020). Wearable photoplethysmography for cardiovascular monitoring. Proceedings of the IEEE, 108(2), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2019.2955842

4. Depner, C. M., Stothard, E. R., & Wright, K. P. (2014). Metabolic consequences of sleep and circadian disruption. Current Diabetes Reports, 14(7), 507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-014-0507-z

5. Sadeh, A. (2011). The role and validity of actigraphy in sleep medicine: An update. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 15(4), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2010.10.001

6. Fonseca, P., Weysen, T., Goelema, M. S., Møst, E. I. S., Radha, M., Lunsingh Scheurleer, R., van der Heijden, L., Raymann, R. J. E. M., & Aarts, R. M. (2017). Validation of photoplethysmography-based sleep staging compared with polysomnography in healthy middle-aged adults. Sleep, 40(7), zsx097. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsx097

7. Radha, M., Fonseca, P., Moreau, A., Ross, M., Cerny, A., Anderer, P., Long, X., & Aarts, R. M. (2019). Sleep stage classification from heart-rate variability using long short-term memory neural networks. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 23(6), 2467–2476. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2018.2881425

8. Faust, O., Razaghi, H., Barika, R., Ciaccio, E. J., & Acharya, U. R. (2019). A review of automated sleep stage scoring based on machine learning techniques. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 102, 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.08.005

9. Berry, R. B., Brooks, R., Gamaldo, C. E., Harding, S. M., Marcus, C. L., & Vaughn, B. V. (2012). The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events: Rules, terminology and technical specifications, version 2.0. American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

10. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7

11. Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletarì, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M. N., Landman, B. A., Maier-Hein, K., Ourselin, S., Sheller, M., Summers, R. M., Trask, A., Xu, D., Baust, M., & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. npj Digital Medicine, 3, 119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1

12. Wiens, J., Saria, S., Sendak, M., Ghassemi, M., Liu, V. X., Doshi-Velez, F., Jung, K., Heller, K., Kale, D., Saeed, M., Ossorio, P. N., Thadaney-Israni, S., & Goldenberg, A. (2019). Do no harm: A roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care. Nature Medicine, 25(9), 1337–1340. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0548-6

13. Kroll, R. R., Boyd, J. G., & Maslove, D. M. (2020). Accuracy of a wrist-worn wearable device for monitoring heart rates in hospital inpatients: A prospective observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(2), e16274. https://doi.org/10.2196/16274

14. Zheng, X., Dwyer, V. M., Barrett, L. A., Derakhshani, M., & Hu, S. (2022). Adaptive notch-filtration to effectively recover photoplethysmographic signals during physical activity. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 72, 103303.

15. Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2020.2975749

16. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785–794). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

17. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.

18. Varoquaux, G., & Cheplygina, V. (2022). Machine learning for medical imaging: Methodological failures and recommendations for the future. npj Digital Medicine, 5, 48. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00592-y

19. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607

20. Rajpurkar, P., Chen, E., Banerjee, O., & Topol, E. J. (2022). AI in health and medicine. Nature Medicine, 28(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01614-0

Downloads

Published

2026-08-23

How to Cite

Keren Chapra, Vishal Lyons, & Rainer C. Murray. (2026). Personalized Machine Learning for Sleep and Recovery Assessment Using Continuous Photoplethysmographic Monitoring. International Journal of Clinical and Translational Medicine, 1(1). Retrieved from https://ijctmed.org/index.php/home/article/view/210