AI-Assisted Personalized Anesthetic Planning for Arthroscopic Knee Surgery Based on Peripheral Nerve Block Characteristics
Keywords:
artificial intelligence, personalized anesthesia, arthroscopic knee surgery, peripheral nerve block, clinical decision support, healthcare informatics, perioperative managementAbstract
Arthroscopic knee surgery has become one of the most frequently performed orthopedic procedures worldwide due to its minimally invasive characteristics, reduced hospitalization requirements, and favorable postoperative recovery profiles. Despite these advantages, perioperative pain management remains a substantial clinical challenge because postoperative analgesic responses vary significantly across patients. Peripheral nerve block techniques, particularly femoral nerve block, sciatic nerve block, and combined approaches, have demonstrated substantial benefits in improving pain control and reducing opioid consumption. However, existing anesthetic planning strategies often rely heavily on generalized clinical guidelines and practitioner experience, limiting the ability to accommodate individual variability in anatomical structures, physiological conditions, procedural complexity, and recovery trajectories. Recent advances in artificial intelligence have created opportunities for personalized anesthetic planning through the integration of heterogeneous clinical data sources. This study proposes a system-level framework for AI-assisted anesthetic planning in arthroscopic knee surgery based on peripheral nerve block characteristics. Rather than focusing exclusively on prediction accuracy, the paper examines the broader socio-technical ecosystem required to support personalized decision-making. The proposed framework integrates multimodal patient information, perioperative monitoring data, historical outcomes, and institutional knowledge repositories to generate individualized anesthetic recommendations. Particular attention is given to infrastructure architecture, governance mechanisms, model robustness, fairness considerations, deployment constraints, and long-term sustainability. The analysis demonstrates that successful implementation requires coordination across clinical, computational, organizational, and regulatory domains. AI-assisted planning has the potential to improve analgesic effectiveness, reduce adverse events, optimize resource allocation, and support evidence-based anesthesia practice. Nevertheless, challenges related to data quality, algorithmic transparency, interoperability, clinician trust, and institutional governance remain significant. The paper concludes by outlining future research directions aimed at creating adaptive, trustworthy, and scalable anesthetic intelligence platforms capable of supporting personalized perioperative care.
References
1. [1] Kehlet, H., & Dahl, J. B. (2003). Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. The Lancet, 362(9399), 1921–1928.
2. [2] Hadzic, A. (2017). Textbook of regional anesthesia and acute pain management (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
3. [3] Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56.
4. [4] Mariano, E. R., & Ilfeld, B. M. (2018). Contemporary peripheral nerve blocks for orthopedic surgery. Anesthesiology Clinics, 36(3), 377–390.
5. [5] Abdallah, F. W., & Brull, R. (2011). Is sciatic nerve block advantageous when combined with femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia following knee surgery? Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 58(11), 1049–1061.
6. [6] Gan, T. J. (2017). Poorly controlled postoperative pain: Prevalence, consequences, and prevention. Journal of Pain Research, 10, 2287–2298.
7. 金子, 吴川, 王秀丽, & 刘朋. (2014). 股神经联合坐骨神经阻滞用于膝关节镜诊治术. 实用医学杂志, 30(4), 666-667.
8. [8] Jensen, P. B., Jensen, L. J., & Brunak, S. (2012). Mining electronic health records: Towards better research applications and clinical care. Nature Reviews Genetics, 13(6), 395–405.
9. [9] Esteva, A., Robicquet, A., Ramsundar, B., et al. (2019). A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 24–29.
10. [10] Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1702.08608.
11. [11] Amann, J., Blasimme, A., Vayena, E., Frey, D., & Madai, V. I. (2020). Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: A multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20(1), 310.
12. [12] Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453.
13. [13] European Commission. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Act: Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence. Publications Office of the European Union.
14. [14] Finlayson, S. G., Subbaswamy, A., Singh, K., et al. (2021). The clinician and dataset shift in artificial intelligence. New England Journal of Medicine, 385(3), 283–286.
15. [15] Sutton, R. T., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D. C., et al. (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: Benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(17), 1–10.
16. [16] Mandel, J. C., Kreda, D. A., Mandl, K. D., Kohane, I. S., & Ramoni, R. B. (2016). SMART on FHIR: A standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(5), 899–908.
17. [17] Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D. (2018). Implementing machine learning in health care: Addressing ethical challenges. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(11), 981–983.
18. [18] Hashimoto, D. A., Rosman, G., Rus, D., & Meireles, O. R. (2018). Artificial intelligence in surgery: Promises and perils. Annals of Surgery, 268(1), 70–76.
19. [19] Komorowski, M., Celi, L. A., Badawi, O., Gordon, A. C., & Faisal, A. A. (2018). The artificial intelligence clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care. Nature Medicine, 24(11), 1716–1720.
20. [20] Corral-Acero, J., Margara, F., Marciniak, M., et al. (2020). The ‘Digital Twin’ to enable the vision of precision cardiology. European Heart Journal, 41(48), 4556–4564.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Clinical and Translational Medicine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



